{"name": "Mouly hydroelectric plant, also known as the Pont des Grottes plant.", "slug": "mouly-hydroelectric-plant-also-known-as-the-pont-des-grottes-plant-7699ab5f50c00b9a", "as_of": "2026-10-03T06:54:37.327767+00:00", "depth": "basic", "facts": {"name": {"value": "Mouly hydroelectric plant, also known as the Pont des Grottes plant.", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:3", "claim_id": "e1ca3102-6bd3-48de-a4d7-b1d7ac4422a4", "modality": "reported", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "0e1bfc0a-a1ca-4577-96a7-07cdc05d8688", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "6a4d5d90-b436-4cf9-ae4e-abcd78d6d4a7", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}, "scope": {"value": "The existing run-of-river installation is described as having a roughly 415 m headrace canal, a Kaplan turbine in the existing powerhouse, a 16 m tailrace, and a weir; its reported baseline is 149 kW maximum gross power and about 780 MWh/year average generation over the preceding 18 years. The integrated proposal would widen and extend the headrace along its left bank, install a new turbine in a new powerhouse while retaining the existing building and recycling its equipment, replace the headgate, and rework the existing weir to add a fish pass and rebuild the boat passage. The new powerhouse is not to have a fish pass. About 11,300 m\u00b3 of excavated earth is to be made available to neighboring agricultural landowners. The proposed maximum turbine flow is 14 m\u00b3/s from November through May and 6.9 m\u00b3/s for the rest of the year; proposed maximum gross power is 597 kW. The opinion reports modeled annual generation of 2,423 MWh as the proponent\u2019s more realistic estimate, while also noting a theoretical calculation of 2,610 MWh. The opinion says the currently authorized maximum diverted flow is 3.5 m\u00b3/s but that actual diversion is about 6.5 m\u00b3/s, reported in the file and confirmed during the exchange with the reviewers. It describes a current reserved flow of 10 m\u00b3/s.", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:3", "claim_id": "5451beee-01a6-44ba-a9d7-b6a0104f4913", "modality": "planned", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "0e1bfc0a-a1ca-4577-96a7-07cdc05d8688", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "ba14685a-26e9-40c3-b5fc-2fdb00f76c5d", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}, "country": {"value": "France", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:4", "claim_id": "4933f17d-9989-4282-aa20-6a6f78b50a9a", "modality": "reported", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "d1d200f5-1c26-45d6-b9d7-d7bbe9c2f2b6", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "8eff5c55-ded9-41c2-8f86-f159bc65a834", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}, "ecology": {"value": "The opinion identifies ecological continuity, aquatic and alluvial habitats, water quality, climate-related changes to flows, and sharing water with whitewater recreation as important issues. It identifies the Atlantic salmon, European otter and Pyrenean desman among relevant species; the existing structures are described as preventing fish passage, and the proposed fish pass is intended to address this. The opinion raises concerns that the assessment does not adequately establish how the project will protect habitats and reconcile water uses under changing flows, and calls for better baseline and impact analysis. It also reports a sharp decline in observed salmon reproduction in 2024 and a fishing prohibition effective from July 2024. A monitoring program is described, including flow monitoring, fish surveys and reporting, but the opinion notes that monitoring frequencies, alert thresholds, responsibilities, resources and reporting arrangements are not adequately specified.", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:3", "claim_id": "87813afd-40f5-4103-ac8d-a6054bf14f10", "modality": "reported", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "0e1bfc0a-a1ca-4577-96a7-07cdc05d8688", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "c860fa25-8fc0-465b-b5ec-faa5b8df7a7f", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}, "activity": {"value": "The existing facility generates hydroelectricity. The same river reach is also used for whitewater recreation and training, including slalom and freestyle kayaking; the opinion describes the site as a rare natural kayaking site in France and notes international-level practice on this stretch.", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:3", "claim_id": "b7d10999-6a41-41d4-a01f-7a7ca9d75763", "modality": "reported", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "0e1bfc0a-a1ca-4577-96a7-07cdc05d8688", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "eb138346-b2da-4601-a38b-854697e55a84", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}, "delivery": {"value": "The works were described during the reviewers\u2019 site visit as planned in two phases of six months each, scheduled for low-water periods. The opinion says the file does not clearly or consistently explain the works, their duration or sequencing. Described operations include dewatering the headrace for construction of the new powerhouse, followed by staged dewatering at the weir to widen the canal, install gates and repair the intake, then construct the fish pass and boat passage.", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:8", "claim_id": "77baa998-b356-4187-830f-9ebca3a7218e", "modality": "planned", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "56dedf85-a6f7-43a9-9367-58d5e952f0ac", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "b63d229f-3640-47f3-b333-4b43413f015e", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}, "location": {"value": "On the Gave de Pau, across Lestelle-B\u00e9tharram in Pyr\u00e9n\u00e9es-Atlantiques (department 64) and Saint-P\u00e9-de-Bigorre in Hautes-Pyr\u00e9n\u00e9es (department 65), spanning Nouvelle-Aquitaine and Occitanie. The opinion notes administrative complexity, including differing status of the banks.", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:3", "claim_id": "a98bbdef-1e08-4b5b-86a4-1c299fdee035", "modality": "reported", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "0e1bfc0a-a1ca-4577-96a7-07cdc05d8688", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "e117f9a9-8e89-442d-9387-385d0cd06948", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}, "developer": {"value": "SARL de Lauture is identified as the current operator and as the project petitioner/proponent.", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:3", "claim_id": "786cd2c2-00c8-4cfc-accb-54009be61508", "modality": "reported", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "0e1bfc0a-a1ca-4577-96a7-07cdc05d8688", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "546cf9a0-aee5-46b2-be8d-34348c9f96d0", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}, "regulatory": {"value": "The environmental authority issued its opinion on 25 September 2025 after receiving the file on 15 July 2025. The opinion is neither favorable nor unfavorable and is not the authorization decision. The project is subject to environmental assessment following case-by-case review; the proponent submitted an environmental impact study voluntarily, and the described environmental authorization application also covers water-law and electricity-generation authorizations. The project is subject to Natura 2000 impact assessment. The opinion says the existing installation had not completed all compliance works prescribed in 2003 and lacked a water operating regulation. It also notes an earlier environmental opinion in 2016 and references to a public inquiry initially planned for 2017, whose status required clarification following regulatory changes. The supplied material does not establish whether the current application has since been authorized or whether a public inquiry has occurred.", "rights": "facts_only", "source": {"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}, "locator": "page:2", "claim_id": "6904d45a-80ce-468a-af18-ce7f35f08a7f", "modality": "reported", "confidence": 0.9, "valid_from": null, "attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts", "evidence_id": "9790b237-8b27-481d-a5a2-986a7ae2beeb", "valid_until": null, "assertion_id": "b8cd891d-60a2-4715-8ea0-a004a70b7148", "temporal_expression": "", "extraction_confidence": 0.9}}, "origin": "snapshot", "revision": 1, "timeline": [], "is_sample": false, "project_id": "2f90cb2a-4b4d-4281-8c60-bc2327030230", "publication": {"local_only": false, "reviewed_at": "2026-10-16T06:54:00.044319+00:00", "indexability": "noindex", "buying_window": "unknown", "policy_version": "accepted-destination-v1", "template_version": "dossier-v1"}, "public_summary": "The Mouly hydroelectric plant, also called the Pont des Grottes plant, is an existing run-of-river facility on the Gave de Pau at Lestelle-B\u00e9tharram and Saint-P\u00e9-de-Bigorre. SARL de Lauture is identified as its operator and project proponent. The proposal would expand the headrace, add a new powerhouse and turbine, and rework the weir to provide fish and boat passages. Proposed maximum gross power is 597 kW; the opinion reports 2,423 MWh/year as the proponent\u2019s more realistic modeled generation estimate, distinct from a theoretical 2,610 MWh calculation. \n\nThe environmental authority\u2019s opinion, dated 25 September 2025, raises concerns about ecological continuity, habitats, climate-related flows and sharing water with whitewater recreation. It calls for stronger analysis of hydrology and impacts. The opinion is neither favorable nor unfavorable and is not an authorization decision.", "schema_version": "1.0", "public_unknowns": ["Whether the environmental authorization or other required permits were granted after the 25 September 2025 opinion, and whether public participation subsequently took place.", "Construction start dates and the final confirmed works schedule. The opinion describes two planned six-month phases during low-water periods but says the file does not clearly explain the works, duration or sequencing.", "Final detailed drawings and exact boundaries of excavation, infill, canal widening and work around the existing powerhouse; the opinion says these descriptions were incomplete.", "The final operating and reserved-flow regime, including how it will address future hydrological conditions and balance ecological needs, electricity generation and water sports.", "Project financing, named contractors, procurement arrangements and the identity of the electricity purchaser are not established in the supplied extracts.", "The supplied text covers pages 2\u201312 and 27\u201328 of the 28-page opinion; pages 13\u201326 and graphical content were not interpreted."], "evidence_observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "knowledge_reviewed_at": "2026-10-16T06:54:00.044319+00:00", "decisive_evidence_observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "export_metadata": {"publisher": "CapexCue", "project_title": "Mouly hydroelectric plant", "original_project_title": "Mouly hydroelectric plant, also known as the Pont des Grottes plant.", "canonical_url": "https://capexcue.com/projects/mouly-hydroelectric-plant-also-known-as-the-pont-des-grottes-plant-7699ab5f50c00b9a/", "release": {"id": "67397306-db5a-4f84-ab19-41bef1a4f18c", "number": 1, "published_at": "2026-10-16T06:54:01.636706+00:00"}, "release_reference": "release 1 (67397306-db5a-4f84-ab19-41bef1a4f18c)", "current_dossier_url": "https://capexcue.com/projects/mouly-hydroelectric-plant-also-known-as-the-pont-des-grottes-plant-7699ab5f50c00b9a/", "citation": "CapexCue \u2014 Mouly hydroelectric plant \u2014 dossier released 2026-10-16T06:54:01.636706+00:00, release 1 (67397306-db5a-4f84-ab19-41bef1a4f18c) \u2014 https://capexcue.com/projects/mouly-hydroelectric-plant-also-known-as-the-pont-des-grottes-plant-7699ab5f50c00b9a/.", "edition_note": "This file records the release identified above; visit the current dossier for later updates.", "presentation": {"version": "dossier-presentation-v7", "project_milestones": [], "project_category": {"basis": "codex_retained_dossier_curation", "value": "energy", "support": {"end": 1282, "start": 0, "sources": [{"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}], "modality": "planned", "predicate": "scope", "raw_value": "The existing run-of-river installation is described as having a roughly 415 m headrace canal, a Kaplan turbine in the existing powerhouse, a 16 m tailrace, and a weir; its reported baseline is 149 kW maximum gross power and about 780 MWh/year average generation over the preceding 18 years. The integrated proposal would widen and extend the headrace along its left bank, install a new turbine in a new powerhouse while retaining the existing building and recycling its equipment, replace the headgate, and rework the existing weir to add a fish pass and rebuild the boat passage. The new powerhouse is not to have a fish pass. About 11,300 m\u00b3 of excavated earth is to be made available to neighboring agricultural landowners. The proposed maximum turbine flow is 14 m\u00b3/s from November through May and 6.9 m\u00b3/s for the rest of the year; proposed maximum gross power is 597 kW. The opinion reports modeled annual generation of 2,423 MWh as the proponent\u2019s more realistic estimate, while also noting a theoretical calculation of 2,610 MWh. The opinion says the currently authorized maximum diverted flow is 3.5 m\u00b3/s but that actual diversion is about 6.5 m\u00b3/s, reported in the file and confirmed during the exchange with the reviewers. It describes a current reserved flow of 10 m\u00b3/s.", "statement": "The existing run-of-river installation is described as having a roughly 415 m headrace canal, a Kaplan turbine in the existing powerhouse, a 16 m tailrace, and a weir; its reported baseline is 149 kW maximum gross power and about 780 MWh/year average generation over the preceding 18 years. The integrated proposal would widen and extend the headrace along its left bank, install a new turbine in a new powerhouse while retaining the existing building and recycling its equipment, replace the headgate, and rework the existing weir to add a fish pass and rebuild the boat passage. The new powerhouse is not to have a fish pass. About 11,300 m\u00b3 of excavated earth is to be made available to neighboring agricultural landowners. The proposed maximum turbine flow is 14 m\u00b3/s from November through May and 6.9 m\u00b3/s for the rest of the year; proposed maximum gross power is 597 kW. The opinion reports modeled annual generation of 2,423 MWh as the proponent\u2019s more realistic estimate, while also noting a theoretical calculation of 2,610 MWh. The opinion says the currently authorized maximum diverted flow is 3.5 m\u00b3/s but that actual diversion is about 6.5 m\u00b3/s, reported in the file and confirmed during the exchange with the reviewers. It describes a current reserved flow of 10 m\u00b3/s.", "qualifications": {"attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts"}}, "label": "Energy", "icon": "energy"}, "project_metadata": {"version": "released-metadata-v7", "category": {"basis": "codex_retained_dossier_curation", "value": "energy", "support": {"end": 1282, "start": 0, "sources": [{"url": "https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3_-_centrale_hydroelectrique_du_mouly_sur_le_gave_de_pau_cle1f9fef.pdf", "name": "IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text", "origin": "live", "checksum": "0d134cd5708ff0c0c8ad4fbad2824bf34697f51e284bc0236daac0c5b9807818", "observed_at": "2026-10-03T05:19:19.751882+00:00", "revision_id": "aa0ebe98-a8b1-4dd3-b2d7-c69c9324a6af", "published_at": null}], "modality": "planned", "predicate": "scope", "raw_value": "The existing run-of-river installation is described as having a roughly 415 m headrace canal, a Kaplan turbine in the existing powerhouse, a 16 m tailrace, and a weir; its reported baseline is 149 kW maximum gross power and about 780 MWh/year average generation over the preceding 18 years. The integrated proposal would widen and extend the headrace along its left bank, install a new turbine in a new powerhouse while retaining the existing building and recycling its equipment, replace the headgate, and rework the existing weir to add a fish pass and rebuild the boat passage. The new powerhouse is not to have a fish pass. About 11,300 m\u00b3 of excavated earth is to be made available to neighboring agricultural landowners. The proposed maximum turbine flow is 14 m\u00b3/s from November through May and 6.9 m\u00b3/s for the rest of the year; proposed maximum gross power is 597 kW. The opinion reports modeled annual generation of 2,423 MWh as the proponent\u2019s more realistic estimate, while also noting a theoretical calculation of 2,610 MWh. The opinion says the currently authorized maximum diverted flow is 3.5 m\u00b3/s but that actual diversion is about 6.5 m\u00b3/s, reported in the file and confirmed during the exchange with the reviewers. It describes a current reserved flow of 10 m\u00b3/s.", "statement": "The existing run-of-river installation is described as having a roughly 415 m headrace canal, a Kaplan turbine in the existing powerhouse, a 16 m tailrace, and a weir; its reported baseline is 149 kW maximum gross power and about 780 MWh/year average generation over the preceding 18 years. The integrated proposal would widen and extend the headrace along its left bank, install a new turbine in a new powerhouse while retaining the existing building and recycling its equipment, replace the headgate, and rework the existing weir to add a fish pass and rebuild the boat passage. The new powerhouse is not to have a fish pass. About 11,300 m\u00b3 of excavated earth is to be made available to neighboring agricultural landowners. The proposed maximum turbine flow is 14 m\u00b3/s from November through May and 6.9 m\u00b3/s for the rest of the year; proposed maximum gross power is 597 kW. The opinion reports modeled annual generation of 2,423 MWh as the proponent\u2019s more realistic estimate, while also noting a theoretical calculation of 2,610 MWh. The opinion says the currently authorized maximum diverted flow is 3.5 m\u00b3/s but that actual diversion is about 6.5 m\u00b3/s, reported in the file and confirmed during the exchange with the reviewers. It describes a current reserved flow of 10 m\u00b3/s.", "qualifications": {"attribution": "IGEDD Autorit\u00e9 environnementale opinion: authority synthesis and attributed developer facts"}}}, "input_hash": "8baac9787af34f7c965bfa0ddb332e2ffa3a082dd748d71316c362093f50cd13", "release_id": "67397306-db5a-4f84-ab19-41bef1a4f18c", "type_codes": ["hydropower"], "field_states": {"type": {"state": "accepted", "reason": "French run-of-river hydro project; preserve authorized-versus-actual flow and modeled-output qualifications."}, "region": {"state": "accepted", "reason": "derived_from_accepted_countries"}, "country": {"state": "accepted", "reason": "supported_physical_country"}, "category": {"state": "accepted", "reason": "French run-of-river hydro project; preserve authorized-versus-actual flow and modeled-output qualifications."}}, "region_codes": ["europe"], "release_hash": "51781c8e42fea8c647f0e988f7ecb8b24c0113476103102484d38d1413f382d2", "assessment_id": "367c6aaf-8a02-4c40-b543-e4a5a2ff7949", "country_codes": ["FR"], "assessment_hash": "692e3988bcf912251dc85d168248b5ec71fede485f5608821b9a710c1f519c6e", "country_label": "France", "region_label": "Europe", "type_labels": ["Hydropower"]}, "date_note": "Project event times are distinct from source publication, observation and dossier release dates. An elapsed plan does not establish completion."}}}