Skip to content
Menu
CapexCue · Public evidence · Printed 11 Nov 2026
Explore projects / Project dossier

Canyon Ferry Unit, part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program.

United States · Energy

In-depth research Release 1

Project scope

The unit’s principal structures are Canyon Ferry Dam and Powerplant, with Canyon Ferry Reservoir. The source describes a concrete gravity dam about 1,000 feet long along its crest and 225 feet high, with a central spillway controlled by four radial gates, four river outlets, a pumping intake for the Helena Valley Pumping Plant, and three penstocks. The downstream-toe powerplant houses three vertical-shaft generators. The same unit page also describes upper-lake waterfowl-enhancement works, including a dike system and habitat facilities.

Reported status and procurement

Reported development

The reservoir is reported to have a total capacity of 2,050,900 acre-feet and to store water for irrigation development, including source-stated potential to irrigate 155,600 acres of new land and supplement irrigation on 82,000 acres. The dam also stores unused floodwater and unappropriated water and regulates flows for downstream powerplants. The powerplant is rated at 50,000 kilowatts; the source says its generated electricity is marketed by the Missouri River Basin Transmission Division. A recreation development program described by the source includes picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and swimming.

Procurement availability
Unknown / not established

A source report alone does not establish current progress or an open buying window.

Project summary

Canyon Ferry Unit is part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program in Montana. The source describes its principal infrastructure as Canyon Ferry Dam and Powerplant with Canyon Ferry Reservoir; it places the dam and powerplant on the Missouri River about 17 miles northeast of Helena. The powerplant is reported as rated at 50,000 kilowatts and having three generating units.

The source records dam construction from May 24, 1949, to June 23, 1954, and gives operating dates for the first unit and the other two. It also says the upper-lake wildlife-enhancement construction began in 1972 and was essentially complete in 1978, following an earlier plan and federal assistance request.

A historical section reports that fine material from exposed upper-lake flats contributed to air pollution near the lake after initial filling in 1955, with adverse effects described locally. It gives a Townsend deposition figure of 301 tons per square mire per month, versus 15–20 tons considered acceptable; the area unit in the source is unclear.

Evidence limits and unknowns

The source does not establish the dam, powerplant, reservoir, or wildlife facilities’ present condition or current operating status. It identifies the Bureau of Reclamation as the operating agency and dates the transfer to operation and maintenance to January 1, 1955, but does not establish whether that status remains current.

No current procurement, supplier opportunity, contract, cost, or funding commitment is established. The historical account describes a federal assistance request for wildlife-enhancement works and says construction was essentially complete in 1978.

The supplied page content does not state a publication or last-verification date for its capacity, benefits, and recreation descriptions; their currentness is therefore unknown.

The page lists a Canyon Ferry Unit History document, but that linked document’s contents are not assessed here.

Is this project a fit for your company?

Check how this project relates to what your company supplies, with evidence gaps and a next step.

Create your account for free and include your business details to get custom commercial assessments.

Project metadata

Country
United States
Based on reviewed release evidence
Region
North America
Category
Energy
Derived from released evidence
Physical assets
Hydropower

Based on this release's supporting evidence. Unresolved fields remain unclassified; these labels do not establish current progress or a buying window.

Released facts and supporting evidence

Each fact retains its source, uncertainty and time context. If a publisher page moves or is unavailable, use the recorded quotation and observation date below.

Project name

Source reported

Canyon Ferry Unit, part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program.

Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author.

Source: US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author

Technical record · Canyon Ferry Unit, part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri …
Evidence location
/html/body/div/div[4]/div/div[2]/div[3]/div[1]/h1
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
30c5fc6d-490c-4748-ae0d-d66ab2253e90
Evidence reference
8c1f3343-ceb4-49d5-8283-459f22469ac5
Source revision
8d3b0ad8-c046-40cc-8288-ed785a670703
Content fingerprint
4a30c45a779db0f09f85986ce818c747a3969e610ab6347a2182dd4edf8ceac7
Source address
https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=435

Scope

Source reported

The unit’s principal structures are Canyon Ferry Dam and Powerplant, with Canyon Ferry Reservoir. The source describes a concrete gravity dam about 1,000 feet long along its crest and 225 feet high, with a central spillway controlled by four radial gates, four river outlets, a pumping intake for the Helena Valley Pumping Plant, and three penstocks. The downstream-toe powerplant houses three vertical-shaft generators. The same unit page also describes upper-lake waterfowl-enhancement works, including a dike system and habitat facilities.

Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author.

Source: US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author

Technical record · The unit’s principal structures are Canyon Ferry Dam …
Evidence location
/html/body/div/div[4]/div/div[2]/div[3]/div[4]/p[2]
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
1bd616b0-0bdd-4f6d-b86e-d25f57411696
Evidence reference
e2b256ce-92ce-412b-885c-d52011aafdf6
Source revision
8d3b0ad8-c046-40cc-8288-ed785a670703
Content fingerprint
4a30c45a779db0f09f85986ce818c747a3969e610ab6347a2182dd4edf8ceac7
Source address
https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=435

Project ecology

Source reported

The source reports that fine material from exposed flats at the upper end of the lake contributed to air pollution near the lake after initial filling in 1955, and describes adverse effects on the local living environment, forage crops, and livestock. It reports Townsend deposition averaging 301 tons per square mire per month, compared with 15–20 tons considered acceptable; the source’s stated area unit is unclear. The waterfowl facilities are described as providing nesting and breeding habitat, supplemental resting and feeding sites for migratory birds, and opportunities for public hunting and observation.

Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author.

Source: US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author

Technical record · The source reports that fine material from exposed …
Evidence location
/html/body/div/div[4]/div/div[2]/div[3]/div[6]/p[4]
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
87980fa3-63a9-4d04-a861-3edd258dd439
Evidence reference
64b7b7c4-fa06-4d13-a2f5-19e7b929d8b4
Source revision
8d3b0ad8-c046-40cc-8288-ed785a670703
Content fingerprint
4a30c45a779db0f09f85986ce818c747a3969e610ab6347a2182dd4edf8ceac7
Source address
https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=435

Current activity

Reported as actual

The unit is described as serving power supply, flood control, and irrigation. Dam construction began May 24, 1949, and was completed June 23, 1954; the first power unit began operating December 18, 1953, and the other two began in March 1954. For upper-lake wildlife enhancement, the source says a dike system had been planned by Montana Fish and Game, which lacked the financial capability to undertake it; federal assistance was requested, construction began in 1972, and was essentially complete in 1978.

Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author.

Source: US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author

Technical record · The unit is described as serving power supply, …
Evidence location
/html/body/div/div[4]/div/div[2]/div[3]/div[4]/p[2]
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
c15a80d0-dcbb-4040-9903-cb9da0033d3c
Evidence reference
e2b256ce-92ce-412b-885c-d52011aafdf6
Source revision
8d3b0ad8-c046-40cc-8288-ed785a670703
Content fingerprint
4a30c45a779db0f09f85986ce818c747a3969e610ab6347a2182dd4edf8ceac7
Source address
https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=435

Delivery

Source reported

The reservoir is reported to have a total capacity of 2,050,900 acre-feet and to store water for irrigation development, including source-stated potential to irrigate 155,600 acres of new land and supplement irrigation on 82,000 acres. The dam also stores unused floodwater and unappropriated water and regulates flows for downstream powerplants. The powerplant is rated at 50,000 kilowatts; the source says its generated electricity is marketed by the Missouri River Basin Transmission Division. A recreation development program described by the source includes picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and swimming.

Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author.

Source: US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author

Technical record · The reservoir is reported to have a total …
Evidence location
/html/body/div/div[4]/div/div[2]/div[3]/div[4]/p[2]
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
f69c4c8f-7043-4c3b-a94a-07b462d984c0
Evidence reference
e2b256ce-92ce-412b-885c-d52011aafdf6
Source revision
8d3b0ad8-c046-40cc-8288-ed785a670703
Content fingerprint
4a30c45a779db0f09f85986ce818c747a3969e610ab6347a2182dd4edf8ceac7
Source address
https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=435

Location

Source reported

Montana, on the Missouri River. The source places the dam and powerplant about 17 miles northeast of Helena and says they are about 1.5 miles downstream from the original Montana Power Company dam and powerplant.

Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author.

Source: US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author

Technical record · Montana, on the Missouri River. The source places …
Evidence location
/html/body/div/div[4]/div/div[2]/div[3]/div[1]/div[2]/p[1]
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
5f7a163c-a279-4e6a-bfef-71982886d83d
Evidence reference
81ec6b3b-ca32-4602-a3c7-1c1222bbca22
Source revision
8d3b0ad8-c046-40cc-8288-ed785a670703
Content fingerprint
4a30c45a779db0f09f85986ce818c747a3969e610ab6347a2182dd4edf8ceac7
Source address
https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=435

Implementing agency

Source reported

The Bureau of Reclamation is identified as the operating agency. The source says the unit was transferred to operation and maintenance on January 1, 1955.

Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author.

Source: US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

US Bureau of Reclamation screened government project narrative
Attributed to USBR government authored factual project page or attributed agencyhistory author

Technical record · The Bureau of Reclamation is identified as the …
Evidence location
/html/body/div/div[4]/div/div[2]/div[3]/div[6]/p[7]
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
948f2014-78d0-4888-a21a-6807c3159618
Evidence reference
57777ec4-b712-49c5-b0a8-b6352fcfb6e5
Source revision
8d3b0ad8-c046-40cc-8288-ed785a670703
Content fingerprint
4a30c45a779db0f09f85986ce818c747a3969e610ab6347a2182dd4edf8ceac7
Source address
https://www.usbr.gov/projects/index.php?id=435
Source report history

Prior and superseded states remain labelled. Dates below identify source publication when known, otherwise source observation. They are not assumed event dates; each fact retains its own time qualifications.

  1. No material timeline events have been released.

Follow this project

Get project updates by email when new information is published.

Follow for free without an account, with the option to unsubscribe anytime. We'll email you a link to confirm.

DEEPRFP, S.L.U. uses your email and selected project to confirm and deliver the updates you request. You can stop anytime. Product news needs a separate opt-in. Read the Privacy Policy for legal bases, recipients, retention, your rights and contact details.