Skip to content
Menu
CapexCue · Public evidence · Printed 11 Nov 2026
Explore projects / Project dossier

ZAC Charenton-Bercy (Charenton-le-Pont)

France · Other infrastructure

In-depth research Release 1

Project scope

Plan: The ZAC perimeter is about 20 hectares, with narrower operational works areas. Planned works include reconfiguring rue Baron-Le-Roy within the ZAC and extending it beneath the Paris périphérique, relocating the Bercy 2 shopping centre, constructing a 200 m tower and a new Valmy bridge over the SNCF maintenance site, and building a deck over part of the railway tracks. Parts of the SNCF railway property, the Richelieu co-ownership and gardens, and the Bercy quays are identified as areas without works. The Paris-side continuation of rue Baron-Le-Roy is part of a separate project; the characteristics of the Seine connection remain unspecified.

Reported status and procurement

Reported development

Grand Paris Aménagement is described as carrying the ZAC with the State, Charenton-le-Pont municipality and the Paris Est Marne et Bois territorial public establishment.

Procurement availability
Unknown / not established

Reported regulatory context

The ZAC was created by prefectural order on 23 September 2022. The order adapting the Val-de-Marne flood-risk plan and bringing the local plan into compatibility was signed on 7 December 2023; the environmental authorization was signed on 1 July 2024; and the declaration of public utility was signed on 22 February 2025. The dossier considered in April 2025 was presented for modification of the ZAC creation order and approval of its realization dossier. The opinion reports legal challenges that create a risk for the ZAC procedure. The environmental-authority opinion itself is advisory, not favorable or unfavorable.

A source report alone does not establish current progress or an open buying window.

Project summary

The environmental-authority opinion dated 10 April 2025 describes the planned ZAC Charenton-Bercy redevelopment in Charenton-le-Pont, near the Seine–Marne confluence. It reports a revised programme of approximately 408,000 m² and planned works including housing, offices and activities, retail and hotel space, public facilities, a 200 m tower, a new Valmy bridge and a deck over part of the railway tracks. At the opinion date, phase 1 was defined for 2025–2030, but control of the Martiniquaise land and authorization for the railway deck remained outstanding conditions. The opinion is advisory, not an authorization decision.

Evidence limits and unknowns

The opinion dated 10 April 2025 does not establish project progress after that date.

The detailed design of the Seine connection was still unspecified; the opinion says it was not expected to be defined more precisely before phase 3.

Phases 2 and 3 were indicative and could change order; their development depended in part on decisions about the AP-HP buildings and Bercy 2.

The authority said no response had been provided to its recommendation for a programme of health-risk measures, detailed and quantified for each phase, with occupancy phased consistently with implementation.

The authority recommended testing the flood studies and resilience strategy against the +4°C climate-adaptation trajectory through 2100.

The opinion reports unresolved soil matters: the AP-HP site-specific diagnostic did not establish compatibility with the project, no new diagnostic was available for the Martiniquaise site, and further assessment was identified for the shopping-centre site before phase 3.

Is this project a fit for your company?

Check how this project relates to what your company supplies, with evidence gaps and a next step.

Create your account for free and include your business details to get custom commercial assessments.

Project metadata

Country
France
Based on reviewed release evidence
Region
Europe
Category
Other infrastructure
Derived from released evidence
Physical assets
Not classified

Based on this release's supporting evidence. Unresolved fields remain unclassified; these labels do not establish current progress or a buying window.

Released facts and supporting evidence

Each fact retains its source, uncertainty and time context. If a publisher page moves or is unavailable, use the recorded quotation and observation date below.

Project name

Source reported

ZAC Charenton-Bercy (Charenton-le-Pont)

Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion.

Source: IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion

Technical record · ZAC Charenton-Bercy (Charenton-le-Pont)
Evidence location
page:2
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
8a055347-b152-443e-b2ab-9b4176cca278
Evidence reference
4cac2972-74a0-4b8f-9a33-13b8a9f2a7dc
Source revision
06f9399c-6927-4709-b3b1-02d053725746
Content fingerprint
32d1dabf27713170363fa17d8eb9c5156949d78634fa007efd11d94670304ecd
Source address
https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3__250408_zac_charenton-bercy_4eme_avis_delibere_cle5b9313.pdf

Scope

Planned

The ZAC perimeter is about 20 hectares, with narrower operational works areas. Planned works include reconfiguring rue Baron-Le-Roy within the ZAC and extending it beneath the Paris périphérique, relocating the Bercy 2 shopping centre, constructing a 200 m tower and a new Valmy bridge over the SNCF maintenance site, and building a deck over part of the railway tracks. Parts of the SNCF railway property, the Richelieu co-ownership and gardens, and the Bercy quays are identified as areas without works. The Paris-side continuation of rue Baron-Le-Roy is part of a separate project; the characteristics of the Seine connection remain unspecified.

Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion.

Source: IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion

Technical record · The ZAC perimeter is about 20 hectares, with …
Evidence location
page:6
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
36e6b514-d79d-4897-a5d8-e53925d2e6df
Evidence reference
c5002050-9bc4-4d28-af24-57b947ac8286
Source revision
06f9399c-6927-4709-b3b1-02d053725746
Content fingerprint
32d1dabf27713170363fa17d8eb9c5156949d78634fa007efd11d94670304ecd
Source address
https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3__250408_zac_charenton-bercy_4eme_avis_delibere_cle5b9313.pdf

Project ecology

Source reported

The authority identifies exposure of additional residents to significant health risks, mainly from background air pollution and also from some acute noise exposure. It reports an estimated individual excess risk of about 1.9×10⁻⁵ under an assumption of continuous presence for 70 years, while noting that effective presence is substantially lower. It recommends infrastructure-related health-risk measures, detailed and quantified for each phase, and occupancy phased consistently with their implementation; the opinion says no response was provided to this recommendation and reiterates the concern. The authority also reports potentially improved flood conditions and partly improved stormwater management relative to the no-project case, but says the studies do not appear to account for climate change and recommends testing resilience against the +4°C adaptation trajectory through 2100. Green-space figures are not fully reconciled: revised rules provide for 23,000 m² without specifying the fully permeable amount, while another comparison gives about 7,700 m² existing and 10,500 m² projected full-ground area. For soils, investigations at the Escoffier and SNCF sites are described as complete and showing localized pollution, with disposal outlets not identified. The AP-HP summary note is reported as erroneous; the site-specific diagnostic did not establish soil compatibility, and the authority recommends resolving doubts before phase 2. No new diagnostic was available for the Martiniquaise site. Soil-gas investigations at the shopping-centre site found anomalies, with further assessment identified as necessary before phase 3.

Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion.

Source: IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion

Technical record · The authority identifies exposure of additional residents to …
Evidence location
page:10
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
5e5102e7-d1aa-4fde-aae3-d568da445a26
Evidence reference
e740a5e6-d2d0-4ad5-a6db-e08c61dc5da2
Source revision
06f9399c-6927-4709-b3b1-02d053725746
Content fingerprint
32d1dabf27713170363fa17d8eb9c5156949d78634fa007efd11d94670304ecd
Source address
https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3__250408_zac_charenton-bercy_4eme_avis_delibere_cle5b9313.pdf

Current activity

Planned

Planned mixed-use redevelopment. The revised programme is approximately 145,000 m² of housing, including 38,000 m² of social housing; 180,000 m² of offices and activities; 75,000 m² of retail and hotel space; and 8,000 m² of public facilities, approximately 408,000 m² in total. Project materials also describe 1,500 homes and about 1,650 managed-residence places, with 30% social housing.

Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion.

Source: IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion

Technical record · Planned mixed-use redevelopment. The revised programme is approximately …
Evidence location
page:6
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
3e0f3638-43e6-478c-8fd2-f9c7eabf337b
Evidence reference
c5002050-9bc4-4d28-af24-57b947ac8286
Source revision
06f9399c-6927-4709-b3b1-02d053725746
Content fingerprint
32d1dabf27713170363fa17d8eb9c5156949d78634fa007efd11d94670304ecd
Source address
https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3__250408_zac_charenton-bercy_4eme_avis_delibere_cle5b9313.pdf

Delivery

Source reported

Grand Paris Aménagement is described as carrying the ZAC with the State, Charenton-le-Pont municipality and the Paris Est Marne et Bois territorial public establishment.

Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion.

Source: IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion

Technical record · Grand Paris Aménagement is described as carrying the …
Evidence location
page:3
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
48ff9c8f-6b6d-4d48-91ef-851f41e3688d
Evidence reference
ca9ab5b7-a429-4497-a09f-c8e65599850c
Source revision
06f9399c-6927-4709-b3b1-02d053725746
Content fingerprint
32d1dabf27713170363fa17d8eb9c5156949d78634fa007efd11d94670304ecd
Source address
https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3__250408_zac_charenton-bercy_4eme_avis_delibere_cle5b9313.pdf

Location

Source reported

Charenton-le-Pont, Val-de-Marne, Île-de-France, near the Seine–Marne confluence; a substantial part of the operation is in the Seine’s major river bed.

Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion.

Source: IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion

Technical record · Charenton-le-Pont, Val-de-Marne, Île-de-France, near the Seine–Marne confluence; a …
Evidence location
page:4
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
f5e730fd-694c-4c12-be99-bc8c83fdedd8
Evidence reference
a1c2c118-a73a-4439-b485-7b501ea03543
Source revision
06f9399c-6927-4709-b3b1-02d053725746
Content fingerprint
32d1dabf27713170363fa17d8eb9c5156949d78634fa007efd11d94670304ecd
Source address
https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3__250408_zac_charenton-bercy_4eme_avis_delibere_cle5b9313.pdf

Regulatory evidence

Source reported

The ZAC was created by prefectural order on 23 September 2022. The order adapting the Val-de-Marne flood-risk plan and bringing the local plan into compatibility was signed on 7 December 2023; the environmental authorization was signed on 1 July 2024; and the declaration of public utility was signed on 22 February 2025. The dossier considered in April 2025 was presented for modification of the ZAC creation order and approval of its realization dossier. The opinion reports legal challenges that create a risk for the ZAC procedure. The environmental-authority opinion itself is advisory, not favorable or unfavorable.

Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion.

Source: IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion

Technical record · The ZAC was created by prefectural order on …
Evidence location
page:2
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
54d5ac7a-b7b4-4c3b-ba7b-ac45c80008f8
Evidence reference
4cac2972-74a0-4b8f-9a33-13b8a9f2a7dc
Source revision
06f9399c-6927-4709-b3b1-02d053725746
Content fingerprint
32d1dabf27713170363fa17d8eb9c5156949d78634fa007efd11d94670304ecd
Source address
https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3__250408_zac_charenton-bercy_4eme_avis_delibere_cle5b9313.pdf

Next milestone

Unknown

As of 10 April 2025, the dossier was being considered for modification of the ZAC creation order and approval of the realization dossier. Control of the Martiniquaise land and authorization for the railway deck remained outstanding conditions for phase 1. The source gives no construction start date.

Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion.

Source: IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text · publication date not recorded · observed 2026-10-04

Sources and evidence · IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Source published: Not recordedObserved: 2026-10-04

IGEDD environmental authority native opinion text
Attributed to IGEDD Autorité environnementale governmentauthoredopinion

Technical record · As of 10 April 2025, the dossier was …
Evidence location
page:3
Claim confidence
0.90 on a 0–1 evidence-support scaleNot a probability of project success or procurement availability.
Claim reference
bd359d5e-037a-4eea-9b31-765acd3ad6f4
Evidence reference
ca9ab5b7-a429-4497-a09f-c8e65599850c
Source revision
06f9399c-6927-4709-b3b1-02d053725746
Content fingerprint
32d1dabf27713170363fa17d8eb9c5156949d78634fa007efd11d94670304ecd
Source address
https://www.igedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/3__250408_zac_charenton-bercy_4eme_avis_delibere_cle5b9313.pdf
Source report history

Prior and superseded states remain labelled. Dates below identify source publication when known, otherwise source observation. They are not assumed event dates; each fact retains its own time qualifications.

  1. No material timeline events have been released.

Follow this project

Get project updates by email when new information is published.

Follow for free without an account, with the option to unsubscribe anytime. We'll email you a link to confirm.

DEEPRFP, S.L.U. uses your email and selected project to confirm and deliver the updates you request. You can stop anytime. Product news needs a separate opt-in. Read the Privacy Policy for legal bases, recipients, retention, your rights and contact details.